<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic SUR (seemingly unrelated regression) in SAS in SAS Forecasting and Econometrics</title>
    <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Forecasting-and-Econometrics/SUR-seemingly-unrelated-regression-in-SAS/m-p/103406#M539</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;HI, all:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have a question about the technique details of SUR employed in proc syslin or proc model.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We know that SUR will use the cross-equation variance-covariance matrix to do the estimation. However, if I have more equations that number of observations (in each equations). For example, I have 30 equations and 20 observations in each equation. The variance covariance matrix would be 30 by 30. However, I only have the matrix of residuals as 30*20. In this case, would the variance covariance matrix used in SUR be deficient? How does SAS deal with this problem? I expect there should be at least some warning from SAS, but it is not.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Jing&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 09 Apr 2013 21:53:31 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>bigbigben</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-04-09T21:53:31Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>SUR (seemingly unrelated regression) in SAS</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Forecasting-and-Econometrics/SUR-seemingly-unrelated-regression-in-SAS/m-p/103406#M539</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;HI, all:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have a question about the technique details of SUR employed in proc syslin or proc model.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We know that SUR will use the cross-equation variance-covariance matrix to do the estimation. However, if I have more equations that number of observations (in each equations). For example, I have 30 equations and 20 observations in each equation. The variance covariance matrix would be 30 by 30. However, I only have the matrix of residuals as 30*20. In this case, would the variance covariance matrix used in SUR be deficient? How does SAS deal with this problem? I expect there should be at least some warning from SAS, but it is not.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Jing&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Apr 2013 21:53:31 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Forecasting-and-Econometrics/SUR-seemingly-unrelated-regression-in-SAS/m-p/103406#M539</guid>
      <dc:creator>bigbigben</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-04-09T21:53:31Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: SUR (seemingly unrelated regression) in SAS</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Forecasting-and-Econometrics/SUR-seemingly-unrelated-regression-in-SAS/m-p/103407#M540</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Jing,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I spoke with the developer of proc model and he had this response, "&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="color: #1f497d; font-family: 'Calibri','sans-serif'; font-size: 11pt;"&gt;For the SUR method MODEL computes a pseudo inverse of the OLS&lt;BR /&gt;residuals’&amp;nbsp; covariance matrix.&amp;nbsp; When the OLS covariance matrix is&lt;BR /&gt;singular a warning is produced explaining which equations’ rows&amp;nbsp; in the&lt;BR /&gt;covariance matrix are linearly dependent, and PROC&amp;nbsp; MODEL continues with&lt;BR /&gt;the SUR estimation of parameters.&amp;nbsp; If the user isn’t getting this warning&lt;BR /&gt;message for a known deficient matrix then something else is going on "&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="color: #1f497d; font-family: 'Calibri','sans-serif'; font-size: 11pt;"&gt;He also requested that he would be happy to look at your code and data if you wouldn't mind providing and example of the issue. - Ken &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Apr 2013 20:49:09 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Forecasting-and-Econometrics/SUR-seemingly-unrelated-regression-in-SAS/m-p/103407#M540</guid>
      <dc:creator>ets_kps</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-04-11T20:49:09Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

