<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Clarification on PROC ARIMA manual (p. 209) in SAS Forecasting and Econometrics</title>
    <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Forecasting-and-Econometrics/Clarification-on-PROC-ARIMA-manual-p-209/m-p/953141#M4889</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;a href="https://communities.sas.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/467482"&gt;@sasalex2024&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;My understanding of this line is, if&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;y_t = a + b*x_t + v_t,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;where x_t is nonstationary input, v_t is stationary noise term. Then the non-stationarity of x_t will also transmit to the response y_t. If you know for a fact that y_t is actually stationary, then the non-stationary x_t would not be appropriate explanatory variable for y_t. The simplest example is, if x_t has an upward trend, but y_t does not, then you probably will not think the upward trending x_t explains the non-trending y_t series. For example, if&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;x_t = c+ d*t + u_t,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;with t being the time trend variable,&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;then since y_t = a + b*x_t + v_t, you now have&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;y_t = a + b*(c+d*t + u_t) + v_t&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;so&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;y_t = (a + b*c) + (b*d)*t + b*u_t + v_t&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;this implies that y_t also has a trend term, which is not true, since you know y_t is stationary and does not have trend.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I hope this helps.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 10 Dec 2024 21:03:43 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>SASCom1</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2024-12-10T21:03:43Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Clarification on PROC ARIMA manual (p. 209)</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Forecasting-and-Econometrics/Clarification-on-PROC-ARIMA-manual-p-209/m-p/952234#M4876</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Dear SAS Community,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am referring to the SAS ARIMA manual, page 209 ("Stationarity and Input Series"). I find the following statement confusing, and I apologize if I lack the knowledge to fully understand it:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;"If the inputs are nonstationary, the response series will be nonstationary, even though the noise process might be stationary."&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The reason I find this confusing is that if we have a raw data series for Yt​ and Yt&amp;nbsp;is stationary to begin with, then simply by regressing Yt​ on some nonstationary Xt​, it should not make original&amp;nbsp;Yt​ nonstationary because Yt​ is a known and given series (assumed to be stationary). Does SAS refer to the fitted values of Yt​? Or is there something else I am missing?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you for your help.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 01 Dec 2024 12:47:41 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Forecasting-and-Econometrics/Clarification-on-PROC-ARIMA-manual-p-209/m-p/952234#M4876</guid>
      <dc:creator>sasalex2024</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-12-01T12:47:41Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Clarification on PROC ARIMA manual (p. 209)</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Forecasting-and-Econometrics/Clarification-on-PROC-ARIMA-manual-p-209/m-p/952618#M4886</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;This was first posted in "Statistical Procedures"-board and hence is a duplicate of&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;A href="https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Clarification-on-SAS-ARIMA-Manual-p-209/m-p/952208" target="_blank"&gt;https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Clarification-on-SAS-ARIMA-Manual-p-209/m-p/952208&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I do not want to stop the discussion with this, of course, because the question has still not received a conclusive answer (otherwise it would not have been asked again, of course ... and this is indeed a more appropriate board for the topic at hand).&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Ciao, Koen&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Dec 2024 11:03:53 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Forecasting-and-Econometrics/Clarification-on-PROC-ARIMA-manual-p-209/m-p/952618#M4886</guid>
      <dc:creator>sbxkoenk</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-12-05T11:03:53Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Clarification on PROC ARIMA manual (p. 209)</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Forecasting-and-Econometrics/Clarification-on-PROC-ARIMA-manual-p-209/m-p/953141#M4889</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;a href="https://communities.sas.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/467482"&gt;@sasalex2024&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;My understanding of this line is, if&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;y_t = a + b*x_t + v_t,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;where x_t is nonstationary input, v_t is stationary noise term. Then the non-stationarity of x_t will also transmit to the response y_t. If you know for a fact that y_t is actually stationary, then the non-stationary x_t would not be appropriate explanatory variable for y_t. The simplest example is, if x_t has an upward trend, but y_t does not, then you probably will not think the upward trending x_t explains the non-trending y_t series. For example, if&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;x_t = c+ d*t + u_t,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;with t being the time trend variable,&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;then since y_t = a + b*x_t + v_t, you now have&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;y_t = a + b*(c+d*t + u_t) + v_t&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;so&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;y_t = (a + b*c) + (b*d)*t + b*u_t + v_t&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;this implies that y_t also has a trend term, which is not true, since you know y_t is stationary and does not have trend.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I hope this helps.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Dec 2024 21:03:43 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Forecasting-and-Econometrics/Clarification-on-PROC-ARIMA-manual-p-209/m-p/953141#M4889</guid>
      <dc:creator>SASCom1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-12-10T21:03:43Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

