<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Using non stationary independent variables in SAS Forecasting and Econometrics</title>
    <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Forecasting-and-Econometrics/Using-non-stationary-independent-variables/m-p/725678#M4062</link>
    <description>&lt;DIV class="postbody"&gt;
&lt;DIV id="post_content67382"&gt;
&lt;DIV class="content"&gt;Dear Time Series/Regression Experts:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Is it econometrically sound/okay to use non-stationary independent variables in a time-series (ols) regression? Here's the following delimma/options using the same starting raw/untransformed original data series:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;1. I have a regression whereby the dependent variable and independent variables are all stationary (let's say using log difference transformation for all dependent and independent variables). However, then the R squared value from the regression is very low (below 0.20). Coefficients of all variables are statistically significant and regression residuals are stationary and normally distributed. &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;2. I can run a regression whereby the dependent variable "is" stationary but independent variables are not stationary. However, the R Squared value is much better (&amp;gt;0.40). Coefficients of all variables are statistically significant and regression residuals are still stationary and normally distributed.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;3. I compare the final forecasts of the raw/untransformed data resulting form 1 and 2 and and they are very similar.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Below are my questions:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Is the 2nd model econometrically sound? Are there any published papers to support this? I found an interesting article about "ovedifferencing" by Professor Cochrane which argues that when we overdifference, much of the variation in the data can be thrown out. &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;A class="postlink" href="https://static1.squarespace.com/static/5e6033a4ea02d801f37e15bb/t/5eda716edf351879908c4cad/1591374191294/overdifferencing.pdf" target="_blank"&gt;https://static1.squarespace.com/static/ ... encing.pdf&lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Any latest research suggests option 2 is "okay"?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Thanks!&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;DIV class="back2top"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2021 23:32:17 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>ubshams</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2021-03-11T23:32:17Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Using non stationary independent variables</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Forecasting-and-Econometrics/Using-non-stationary-independent-variables/m-p/725678#M4062</link>
      <description>&lt;DIV class="postbody"&gt;
&lt;DIV id="post_content67382"&gt;
&lt;DIV class="content"&gt;Dear Time Series/Regression Experts:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Is it econometrically sound/okay to use non-stationary independent variables in a time-series (ols) regression? Here's the following delimma/options using the same starting raw/untransformed original data series:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;1. I have a regression whereby the dependent variable and independent variables are all stationary (let's say using log difference transformation for all dependent and independent variables). However, then the R squared value from the regression is very low (below 0.20). Coefficients of all variables are statistically significant and regression residuals are stationary and normally distributed. &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;2. I can run a regression whereby the dependent variable "is" stationary but independent variables are not stationary. However, the R Squared value is much better (&amp;gt;0.40). Coefficients of all variables are statistically significant and regression residuals are still stationary and normally distributed.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;3. I compare the final forecasts of the raw/untransformed data resulting form 1 and 2 and and they are very similar.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Below are my questions:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Is the 2nd model econometrically sound? Are there any published papers to support this? I found an interesting article about "ovedifferencing" by Professor Cochrane which argues that when we overdifference, much of the variation in the data can be thrown out. &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;A class="postlink" href="https://static1.squarespace.com/static/5e6033a4ea02d801f37e15bb/t/5eda716edf351879908c4cad/1591374191294/overdifferencing.pdf" target="_blank"&gt;https://static1.squarespace.com/static/ ... encing.pdf&lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Any latest research suggests option 2 is "okay"?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Thanks!&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;DIV class="back2top"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2021 23:32:17 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Forecasting-and-Econometrics/Using-non-stationary-independent-variables/m-p/725678#M4062</guid>
      <dc:creator>ubshams</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-03-11T23:32:17Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

