<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: DIckey Fuller interpretation in SAS Forecasting and Econometrics</title>
    <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Forecasting-and-Econometrics/DIckey-Fuller-interpretation/m-p/357310#M2334</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi Sizzen,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;For the table provided of Dickey-Fuller test results on your first-differenced series, all 3 p-values shown in the Pr &amp;lt; Tau column are smaller than the alpha-level you mentioned of 0.05.&amp;nbsp; This causes you to reject the null hypothesis that the series has a unit root and conclude that no further differencing is needed.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I hope this helps!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 09 May 2017 21:30:40 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>dw_sas</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2017-05-09T21:30:40Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>DIckey Fuller interpretation</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Forecasting-and-Econometrics/DIckey-Fuller-interpretation/m-p/356930#M2322</link>
      <description>&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;IMG src="https://communities.sas.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/8762i953278793E277D63/image-size/original?v=1.0&amp;amp;px=-1" border="0" alt="kl.PNG" title="kl.PNG" /&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have time series, and after 1st difference i got this .&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;Pr&amp;lt;Tau in first and second row is &amp;lt;0,05, but in third line it is &amp;gt;0,05.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;So what i have to do ? It is stationary or i have to do second difference ?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 May 2017 16:42:11 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Forecasting-and-Econometrics/DIckey-Fuller-interpretation/m-p/356930#M2322</guid>
      <dc:creator>Sizzen</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-05-08T16:42:11Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: DIckey Fuller interpretation</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Forecasting-and-Econometrics/DIckey-Fuller-interpretation/m-p/357310#M2334</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi Sizzen,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;For the table provided of Dickey-Fuller test results on your first-differenced series, all 3 p-values shown in the Pr &amp;lt; Tau column are smaller than the alpha-level you mentioned of 0.05.&amp;nbsp; This causes you to reject the null hypothesis that the series has a unit root and conclude that no further differencing is needed.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I hope this helps!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 May 2017 21:30:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Forecasting-and-Econometrics/DIckey-Fuller-interpretation/m-p/357310#M2334</guid>
      <dc:creator>dw_sas</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-05-09T21:30:40Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

