<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Unobserved Components Model- Inclusion of Trend/Constant in SAS Forecasting and Econometrics</title>
    <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Forecasting-and-Econometrics/Unobserved-Components-Model-Inclusion-of-Trend-Constant/m-p/231461#M1426</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;I would like to know if when developing a UCM model a constant always be included in the model? A co-worker(s) has raised this issue and to my knowledge I have communicated to them that most of the literature that I have researched there has been no literature stating that a constant should always be included in the model.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2015 21:42:18 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>timothymbanks</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2015-10-23T21:42:18Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Unobserved Components Model- Inclusion of Trend/Constant</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Forecasting-and-Econometrics/Unobserved-Components-Model-Inclusion-of-Trend-Constant/m-p/231461#M1426</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I would like to know if when developing a UCM model a constant always be included in the model? A co-worker(s) has raised this issue and to my knowledge I have communicated to them that most of the literature that I have researched there has been no literature stating that a constant should always be included in the model.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2015 21:42:18 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Forecasting-and-Econometrics/Unobserved-Components-Model-Inclusion-of-Trend-Constant/m-p/231461#M1426</guid>
      <dc:creator>timothymbanks</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-10-23T21:42:18Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Unobserved Components Model- Inclusion of Trend/Constant</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Forecasting-and-Econometrics/Unobserved-Components-Model-Inclusion-of-Trend-Constant/m-p/232306#M1438</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;A constant or trend is NOT included in a UCM model by default.&amp;nbsp; Similarly, an error component (IRREGULAR) is also NOT included by default.&amp;nbsp; This is different from other procedures such as PROC REG or PROC ARIMA.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;Most often,&amp;nbsp;the modeling of&amp;nbsp;trend is the main purpose so it did not seem reasonable to include a particular type of trend (even a constant)&amp;nbsp;as default.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Of course, this type of design decision is a matter of taste.&amp;nbsp; At the time of UCM development, I decided that the simple REG case is rare.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2015 19:04:38 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Forecasting-and-Econometrics/Unobserved-Components-Model-Inclusion-of-Trend-Constant/m-p/232306#M1438</guid>
      <dc:creator>rselukar</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-10-29T19:04:38Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

