<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: FK-PK - better performance in Developers</title>
    <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Developers/FK-PK-better-performance/m-p/67535#M3336</link>
    <description>The main application for IC is updating tables, not querying.&lt;BR /&gt;
I have seen no examples nor documentation that indicates that the SQL/WHERE-planner takes IC into account. &lt;BR /&gt;
So my qualified guess is no, there is probably be no difference.&lt;BR /&gt;
/Linus</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 07:43:22 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>LinusH</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2009-08-28T07:43:22Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>FK-PK - better performance</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Developers/FK-PK-better-performance/m-p/67533#M3334</link>
      <description>Hi:&lt;BR /&gt;
question:&lt;BR /&gt;
I know that indexes are automatically built when creating , say, a FK to PK relation. And it is clear that  indexes allow for the enforcement of rules when incoming rows are getting updated or coming in.  My question is if  having a FK to PK relation will increase performance when querying versus having plain indexes in both tables without IC.  If there is a performance increase that the table with the FK does not need to consult its index but uses the PK index?  Is there any performance boost when having IC as opposed to simple indexes?&lt;BR /&gt;
Thanks&lt;BR /&gt;
jp</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2009 13:40:49 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Developers/FK-PK-better-performance/m-p/67533#M3334</guid>
      <dc:creator>jplarios</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-08-27T13:40:49Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: FK-PK - better performance</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Developers/FK-PK-better-performance/m-p/67534#M3335</link>
      <description>This forum is restricted to discussion of SAS Stored Processes.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;A href="http://support.sas.com/documentation/cdl/en/stpug/61271/HTML/default/a003152554.htm" target="_blank"&gt;http://support.sas.com/documentation/cdl/en/stpug/61271/HTML/default/a003152554.htm&lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
You might want to search support.sas.com for an answer to your question.  Here is one page you might find helpful:&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;A href="http://support.sas.com/documentation/cdl/en/lrcon/61722/HTML/default/a000403555.htm" target="_blank"&gt;http://support.sas.com/documentation/cdl/en/lrcon/61722/HTML/default/a000403555.htm&lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Vince DelGobbo&lt;BR /&gt;
SAS R&amp;amp;D</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2009 13:51:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Developers/FK-PK-better-performance/m-p/67534#M3335</guid>
      <dc:creator>Vince_SAS</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-08-27T13:51:46Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: FK-PK - better performance</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Developers/FK-PK-better-performance/m-p/67535#M3336</link>
      <description>The main application for IC is updating tables, not querying.&lt;BR /&gt;
I have seen no examples nor documentation that indicates that the SQL/WHERE-planner takes IC into account. &lt;BR /&gt;
So my qualified guess is no, there is probably be no difference.&lt;BR /&gt;
/Linus</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 07:43:22 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Developers/FK-PK-better-performance/m-p/67535#M3336</guid>
      <dc:creator>LinusH</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-08-28T07:43:22Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

