<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Chaining Stored processes in Developers</title>
    <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Developers/Chaining-Stored-processes/m-p/371#M1480</link>
    <description>I am new to Stored Processes. We are trying to convert all .sas programs (reports) into Stored processes. &lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
In our old sas code we are using include to call other code. I am looking for a way to replace the include command by calling a stored process. Is this possible and how.</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 06 Apr 2006 14:13:55 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>deleted_user</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2006-04-06T14:13:55Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Chaining Stored processes</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Developers/Chaining-Stored-processes/m-p/371#M1480</link>
      <description>I am new to Stored Processes. We are trying to convert all .sas programs (reports) into Stored processes. &lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
In our old sas code we are using include to call other code. I am looking for a way to replace the include command by calling a stored process. Is this possible and how.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Apr 2006 14:13:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Developers/Chaining-Stored-processes/m-p/371#M1480</guid>
      <dc:creator>deleted_user</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-04-06T14:13:55Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Chaining Stored processes</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Developers/Chaining-Stored-processes/m-p/372#M1481</link>
      <description>I don't believe this is possible in SAS 9.1.x.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
A solution around this is to convert your programs into macros and call these macros from your stored processes, thereby enabling calling the code chunks from many stored processes.</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 08 Apr 2006 03:10:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Developers/Chaining-Stored-processes/m-p/372#M1481</guid>
      <dc:creator>deleted_user</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-04-08T03:10:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Chaining Stored processes</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Developers/Chaining-Stored-processes/m-p/373#M1482</link>
      <description>I was afraid that is was not possible. &lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Stored Processes have the advantage that the meta data is stored in the meta data server and you can control who may use the Stored process. &lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Another advantage is that (we are using Unix) that the Stored Processes places the code on the server with the correct user rights.</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Apr 2006 06:04:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Developers/Chaining-Stored-processes/m-p/373#M1482</guid>
      <dc:creator>deleted_user</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-04-10T06:04:42Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Chaining Stored processes</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Developers/Chaining-Stored-processes/m-p/374#M1483</link>
      <description>Do you really need to convert all the %INCLUDE code to stored processes?  People routinely write stored processes that use %INCLUDE.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Vince DelGobbo&lt;BR /&gt;
SAS R&amp;amp;D</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Apr 2006 15:20:27 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Developers/Chaining-Stored-processes/m-p/374#M1483</guid>
      <dc:creator>Vince_SAS</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-04-10T15:20:27Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

