<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Handling Partial Associations and Interactions in Scorecard development Process in SAS Data Science</title>
    <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Data-Science/Handling-Partial-Associations-and-Interactions-in-Scorecard/m-p/538316#M7684</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;I am referring the resources from SAS on the scorecard development process (&lt;A href="https://www.sas.com/content/dam/SAS/en_us/doc/whitepaper1/building-credit-scorecards-using-credit-scoring-for-SAS-enterprise-miner-104182.pdf" target="_self"&gt;Link&lt;/A&gt;). I see the Logisitc regression does not do well when there are interactions between the characteristics which are inputs to the model. I did not see the methodologies to handle these. I also understand that Decision tree algorithm handles such issues well.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am thinking of one approach in which I can at first use Decision tree to choose the best variables and then use Interactive grouping before actually feeding them into Scorecard.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Wish to receive an advise whether it makes sense or any cautions need to be taken while doing it.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;kind regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Mari&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2019 16:05:56 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>ggfggrr</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2019-02-25T16:05:56Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Handling Partial Associations and Interactions in Scorecard development Process</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Data-Science/Handling-Partial-Associations-and-Interactions-in-Scorecard/m-p/538316#M7684</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I am referring the resources from SAS on the scorecard development process (&lt;A href="https://www.sas.com/content/dam/SAS/en_us/doc/whitepaper1/building-credit-scorecards-using-credit-scoring-for-SAS-enterprise-miner-104182.pdf" target="_self"&gt;Link&lt;/A&gt;). I see the Logisitc regression does not do well when there are interactions between the characteristics which are inputs to the model. I did not see the methodologies to handle these. I also understand that Decision tree algorithm handles such issues well.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am thinking of one approach in which I can at first use Decision tree to choose the best variables and then use Interactive grouping before actually feeding them into Scorecard.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Wish to receive an advise whether it makes sense or any cautions need to be taken while doing it.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;kind regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Mari&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2019 16:05:56 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Data-Science/Handling-Partial-Associations-and-Interactions-in-Scorecard/m-p/538316#M7684</guid>
      <dc:creator>ggfggrr</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-02-25T16:05:56Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

