<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: HPSPLIT and rare events in SAS Data Science</title>
    <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Data-Science/HPSPLIT-and-rare-events/m-p/386107#M5703</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;If you have SAS Enterprise Miner, you can incorporate decision weights into the target profile and/or you can choose options in the Decision Tree node that will allow the models to be assessed on just a portion of the data (e.g. the top decile). &amp;nbsp; HPSPLIT does not currently have that functionality but a WEIGHT statement is planned for a future release that would allow you to specify&amp;nbsp;a variable that assigns more weight to the desired target observations. &amp;nbsp; Alternatively, you could try and oversample somewhat to generate a data set with more balance that might generate a more useful model. &amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Hope this helps!&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Doug&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 07 Aug 2017 18:14:47 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>DougWielenga</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2017-08-07T18:14:47Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>HPSPLIT and rare events</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Data-Science/HPSPLIT-and-rare-events/m-p/364316#M5441</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I am using HPSPLIT and working with very highly imbalanced database (3% had "event"). In this case, events are considered extremely costly so we are willing to trade off specificity (false positives) for sensitivity (false negatives). I have tried balancing the data (undersample non-events), but we are still missing too many events.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is there a more direct way of modifying the model to reflect the "high cost" of missing events? Priors, cost weights, etc?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Jun 2017 17:05:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Data-Science/HPSPLIT-and-rare-events/m-p/364316#M5441</guid>
      <dc:creator>JTho</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-06-05T17:05:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: HPSPLIT and rare events</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Data-Science/HPSPLIT-and-rare-events/m-p/386107#M5703</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;If you have SAS Enterprise Miner, you can incorporate decision weights into the target profile and/or you can choose options in the Decision Tree node that will allow the models to be assessed on just a portion of the data (e.g. the top decile). &amp;nbsp; HPSPLIT does not currently have that functionality but a WEIGHT statement is planned for a future release that would allow you to specify&amp;nbsp;a variable that assigns more weight to the desired target observations. &amp;nbsp; Alternatively, you could try and oversample somewhat to generate a data set with more balance that might generate a more useful model. &amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Hope this helps!&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Doug&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Aug 2017 18:14:47 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Data-Science/HPSPLIT-and-rare-events/m-p/386107#M5703</guid>
      <dc:creator>DougWielenga</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-08-07T18:14:47Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

