<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Enterprise Miner Gradient Boosting not producing model in SAS Data Science</title>
    <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Data-Science/Enterprise-Miner-Gradient-Boosting-not-producing-model/m-p/346705#M5179</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;A similar situation was recently resolved by specifying LEAFFRACTION to small number, such as 0.001.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 03 Apr 2017 15:02:05 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>PadraicGNeville</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2017-04-03T15:02:05Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Enterprise Miner Gradient Boosting not producing model</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Data-Science/Enterprise-Miner-Gradient-Boosting-not-producing-model/m-p/325827#M4889</link>
      <description>&lt;TABLE&gt;&lt;TBODY&gt;&lt;TR&gt;&lt;TD&gt;When I run the gradient boosting model in SAS enterprise miner, it only does one iteration even though I specified 100 iterations. None of the variables turn out to be important. The root mean square error for both validation and training was a vertical line at the exact same point(overlapping each other). I get this weird result when I use 40% or more observations as training. When I use a smaller percentage of observation as my training set, I don't have this issue. I have tried other modelling techniques and get regular results irrespective of varying training/validation sample sizes. My dataset has about 400,000 observations. Any thoughts? Suggestions?&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;/TR&gt;&lt;TR&gt;&lt;TD&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;/TR&gt;&lt;/TBODY&gt;&lt;/TABLE&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2017 22:16:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Data-Science/Enterprise-Miner-Gradient-Boosting-not-producing-model/m-p/325827#M4889</guid>
      <dc:creator>elomqg</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-01-18T22:16:01Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Enterprise Miner Gradient Boosting not producing model</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Data-Science/Enterprise-Miner-Gradient-Boosting-not-producing-model/m-p/326317#M4892</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Yes this is weird. &amp;nbsp;I guess no split is created in the initial tree. &amp;nbsp; I cannot guess why reducing the number of training observations fixes it. &amp;nbsp;If you are willing and able to provide the data to SAS Tech Support, I will figure out why this is happening.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;-Padraic&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2017 15:48:18 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Data-Science/Enterprise-Miner-Gradient-Boosting-not-producing-model/m-p/326317#M4892</guid>
      <dc:creator>PadraicGNeville</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-01-20T15:48:18Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Enterprise Miner Gradient Boosting not producing model</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Data-Science/Enterprise-Miner-Gradient-Boosting-not-producing-model/m-p/346705#M5179</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;A similar situation was recently resolved by specifying LEAFFRACTION to small number, such as 0.001.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Apr 2017 15:02:05 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Data-Science/Enterprise-Miner-Gradient-Boosting-not-producing-model/m-p/346705#M5179</guid>
      <dc:creator>PadraicGNeville</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-04-03T15:02:05Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

