<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Regression without P value? in SAS Data Science</title>
    <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Data-Science/Regression-without-P-value/m-p/299225#M4445</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;They shouldn't...what parameterization method did you use?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 19 Sep 2016 09:19:57 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Reeza</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2016-09-19T09:19:57Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Regression without P value?</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Data-Science/Regression-without-P-value/m-p/299216#M4442</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have run a Stepwise regression model, and i am trying to interpret&amp;nbsp;result, one of the Attributes, Addr_Type is with 0 degree of freedom and P value = ".",&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;How should i interpret this? Would appreciate your help. Thanks.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Here are my output...&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Type 3 Analysis of Effects&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Wald&lt;BR /&gt;Effect DF Chi-Square Pr &amp;gt; ChiSq&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Addr_Type 0 . .&lt;BR /&gt;Generation 7 102.7977 &amp;lt;.0001&lt;BR /&gt;IMP_LG10_If_Recency 1 184.6600 &amp;lt;.0001&lt;BR /&gt;OPT_Cnt_Issue_Agt 1 24.5667 &amp;lt;.0001&lt;BR /&gt;OPT_Cnt_RP 3 115.4793 &amp;lt;.0001&lt;BR /&gt;OPT_Entry_Ph_Age 3 11.7314 0.0084&lt;BR /&gt;OPT_Mosaic_Score 2 11.1377 0.0038&lt;BR /&gt;OPT_Patch_Age 3 151.7408 &amp;lt;.0001&lt;BR /&gt;OPT_TWP_UIP_Lifestyle 2 15.7572 0.0004&lt;BR /&gt;OPT_TWP_UIP_PA 1 15.5400 &amp;lt;.0001&lt;BR /&gt;OPT_TWP_W_Savings 2 26.2818 &amp;lt;.0001&lt;BR /&gt;Patch_Marital 5 16.5682 0.0054&lt;BR /&gt;Ph_Gender 4 20.2264 0.0005&lt;BR /&gt;ind_GECashflo 1 11.1497 0.0008&lt;BR /&gt;ind_GS 1 9.3346 0.0022&lt;BR /&gt;ind_LIssue_EQ_LSrvcng_Agt 1 22.9814 &amp;lt;.0001&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Analysis of Maximum Likelihood Estimates&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Standard Wald Standardized&lt;BR /&gt;Parameter DF Estimate Error Chi-Square Pr &amp;gt; ChiSq Estimate Exp(Est)&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Intercept 1 -8.6528 23.3951 0.14 0.7115 0.000&lt;BR /&gt;Addr_Type 0. Unkno 1 -0.5979 0.2624 5.19 0.0227 0.550&lt;BR /&gt;Addr_Type HDB 1 -0.2478 0.0768 10.40 0.0013 0.781&lt;BR /&gt;Addr_Type Others 1 -0.3214 0.1351 5.66 0.0174 0.725&lt;BR /&gt;Addr_Type Private 0 0 . . . . .&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;OKLA.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Sep 2016 08:11:22 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Data-Science/Regression-without-P-value/m-p/299216#M4442</guid>
      <dc:creator>okla</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-09-19T08:11:22Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Regression without P value?</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Data-Science/Regression-without-P-value/m-p/299222#M4443</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Address type is categorical. If you have a categorical variable the reference level will not have estimates.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Sep 2016 08:57:19 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Data-Science/Regression-without-P-value/m-p/299222#M4443</guid>
      <dc:creator>Reeza</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-09-19T08:57:19Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Regression without P value?</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Data-Science/Regression-without-P-value/m-p/299223#M4444</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi, Thanks for your reply, but how does that explain my other categorical variables (e.g Generation/Gender/etc), they all have P value?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;OKLA.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Sep 2016 09:03:30 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Data-Science/Regression-without-P-value/m-p/299223#M4444</guid>
      <dc:creator>okla</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-09-19T09:03:30Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Regression without P value?</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Data-Science/Regression-without-P-value/m-p/299225#M4445</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;They shouldn't...what parameterization method did you use?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Sep 2016 09:19:57 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Data-Science/Regression-without-P-value/m-p/299225#M4445</guid>
      <dc:creator>Reeza</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-09-19T09:19:57Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Regression without P value?</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Data-Science/Regression-without-P-value/m-p/299228#M4446</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am using SAS EM 12.1.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;IMG src="https://communities.sas.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/4949iEECE573D2E2F1C6F/image-size/original?v=v2&amp;amp;px=-1" border="0" alt="SAS.png" title="SAS.png" /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;OKLA&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Sep 2016 09:29:08 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Data-Science/Regression-without-P-value/m-p/299228#M4446</guid>
      <dc:creator>okla</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-09-19T09:29:08Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Regression without P value?</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Data-Science/Regression-without-P-value/m-p/299231#M4447</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Change input coding from GLM to Reference and re-run.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Sep 2016 09:43:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Data-Science/Regression-without-P-value/m-p/299231#M4447</guid>
      <dc:creator>Reeza</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-09-19T09:43:14Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Regression without P value?</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Data-Science/Regression-without-P-value/m-p/299284#M4448</link>
      <description>&lt;PRE&gt;
That is because the last level of Addr_Type is reference level, 
that means in real model there is not a variable corresponding to this level,
therefore you will see DF=0 P=. for this level.

If you want see non-missing value,you could change the reference level,like:
class Addr_Type(ref=first) ...........


&lt;/PRE&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Sep 2016 13:36:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Data-Science/Regression-without-P-value/m-p/299284#M4448</guid>
      <dc:creator>Ksharp</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-09-19T13:36:55Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Regression without P value?</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Data-Science/Regression-without-P-value/m-p/299418#M4453</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks again for the help. Really appreciate it.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have tried 2 methods.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Method 1 - Changing the GLM to Deviation in the Input Coding (EM12.1&amp;nbsp;only have either "GLM" or "Deviation"). Once i have changed it to Deviation, Addr_Type p value = 0.0012 now, but&amp;nbsp;the reason why i used GLM at the first place is so that i have a reference variable to compare to, instead of compare to all the level in the same categorical (easier for me to explain to business users).&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Type 3 Analysis of Effects&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Wald&lt;BR /&gt;Effect DF Chi-Square Pr &amp;gt; ChiSq&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Addr_Type 3 15.8203 0.0012&lt;BR /&gt;Generation 7 102.7977 &amp;lt;.0001&lt;BR /&gt;IMP_LG10_If_Recency 1 184.6600 &amp;lt;.0001&lt;BR /&gt;OPT_Cnt_Issue_Agt 1 24.5667 &amp;lt;.0001&lt;BR /&gt;OPT_Cnt_RP 3 115.4793 &amp;lt;.0001&lt;BR /&gt;OPT_Entry_Ph_Age 3 11.7314 0.0084&lt;BR /&gt;OPT_Mosaic_Score 2 11.1377 0.0038&lt;BR /&gt;OPT_Patch_Age 3 151.7408 &amp;lt;.0001&lt;BR /&gt;OPT_TWP_UIP_Lifestyle 2 15.7572 0.0004&lt;BR /&gt;OPT_TWP_UIP_PA 1 15.5400 &amp;lt;.0001&lt;BR /&gt;OPT_TWP_W_Savings 2 26.2818 &amp;lt;.0001&lt;BR /&gt;Patch_Marital 5 16.5682 0.0054&lt;BR /&gt;Ph_Gender 4 20.2264 0.0005&lt;BR /&gt;ind_GECashflo 1 11.1497 0.0008&lt;BR /&gt;ind_GS 1 9.3346 0.0022&lt;BR /&gt;ind_LIssue_EQ_LSrvcng_Agt 1 22.9814 &amp;lt;.0001&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Method 2 - I changed to use a different reference group (i.e. Addr_Type = Private as a reference group (in here is called &lt;SPAN&gt;REP_Addr_Type&lt;/SPAN&gt;), the same P = . came out.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Type 3 Analysis of Effects&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Wald&lt;BR /&gt;Effect DF Chi-Square Pr &amp;gt; ChiSq&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Generation 7 102.7977 &amp;lt;.0001&lt;BR /&gt;IMP_REP_LG10_If_Recency 1 184.6600 &amp;lt;.0001&lt;BR /&gt;OPT_Cnt_Issue_Agt 1 24.5667 &amp;lt;.0001&lt;BR /&gt;OPT_Cnt_RP 3 115.4793 &amp;lt;.0001&lt;BR /&gt;OPT_Entry_Ph_Age 3 11.7314 0.0084&lt;BR /&gt;OPT_Mosaic_Score 2 11.1377 0.0038&lt;BR /&gt;OPT_Patch_Age 3 151.7408 &amp;lt;.0001&lt;BR /&gt;OPT_TWP_UIP_Lifestyle 2 15.7572 0.0004&lt;BR /&gt;OPT_TWP_UIP_PA 1 15.5400 &amp;lt;.0001&lt;BR /&gt;OPT_TWP_W_Savings 2 26.2818 &amp;lt;.0001&lt;BR /&gt;Patch_Marital 5 16.5682 0.0054&lt;BR /&gt;Ph_Gender 4 20.2264 0.0005&lt;BR /&gt;REP_Addr_Type 0 . .&lt;BR /&gt;ind_GECashflo 1 11.1497 0.0008&lt;BR /&gt;ind_GS 1 9.3346 0.0022&lt;BR /&gt;ind_LIssue_EQ_LSrvcng_Agt 1 22.9814 &amp;lt;.0001&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;OKLA.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Sep 2016 00:51:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Data-Science/Regression-without-P-value/m-p/299418#M4453</guid>
      <dc:creator>okla</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-09-20T00:51:36Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

