<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: EM12.1, rule induction note question in SAS Data Science</title>
    <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Data-Science/EM12-1-rule-induction-note-question/m-p/218666#M3162</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I see, thank you for clarifying. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;My only thought is that with the large sample size for node 4, maybe the purity isn't exactly 100% as shown, but actually 99.999 or something and that precision is just not displayed here.&amp;nbsp; You could try changing the Purity Threshold property to 99 and see if it rips node 4 as expected in that case.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2015 18:00:41 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>WendyCzika</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2015-05-29T18:00:41Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>EM12.1, rule induction note question</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Data-Science/EM12-1-rule-induction-note-question/m-p/218663#M3159</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;After run 'rule induction' in EM12.1, from the results I got the first rip with a 100 pure node(say node 7) , but the next rips didn't take the 7 node rows away. Anyone knows why? Thanks. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2015 14:44:57 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Data-Science/EM12-1-rule-induction-note-question/m-p/218663#M3159</guid>
      <dc:creator>user80</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-05-25T14:44:57Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: EM12.1, rule induction note question</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Data-Science/EM12-1-rule-induction-note-question/m-p/218664#M3160</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Can you explain more what you mean by the 7 node rows were not taken away?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Wendy&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2015 15:23:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Data-Science/EM12-1-rule-induction-note-question/m-p/218664#M3160</guid>
      <dc:creator>WendyCzika</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-05-29T15:23:14Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: EM12.1, rule induction note question</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Data-Science/EM12-1-rule-induction-note-question/m-p/218665#M3161</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P align="left" dir="ltr"&gt;&lt;SPAN style="color: #0000ff; font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial;"&gt;Actual situation was that node 4, in rip4, had 100% pure (see below a tested sample), but was not removed (it said: no leaf was rippd from the model), I expected node 4's rows/observations should be removed for next rips, or further modeling process. &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P align="left" dir="ltr"&gt;&amp;nbsp; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P align="left" dir="ltr"&gt; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P align="left" dir="ltr"&gt;&lt;SPAN style="color: #0000ff; font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial;"&gt;RIP4 Leaf Table: Threshold= 100&lt;BR /&gt;No leaf was ripped from the model.&lt;BR /&gt; &lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Predicted:&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Predicted:&lt;BR /&gt;Node&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; N&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; target=0&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; target=1&lt;BR /&gt; &lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp; 4&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 484942&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 1.0000&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0.0000&lt;BR /&gt; 11&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 50101&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0.9993&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0.0007&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P align="left" dir="ltr"&gt;&lt;SPAN style="color: #0000ff; font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial;"&gt; ...&amp;nbsp; &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P align="left" dir="ltr"&gt;&lt;SPAN style="color: #0000ff; font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial;"&gt; ...&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P align="left" dir="ltr"&gt;&lt;SPAN style="color: #0000ff; font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial;"&gt;....&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2015 17:37:34 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Data-Science/EM12-1-rule-induction-note-question/m-p/218665#M3161</guid>
      <dc:creator>user80</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-05-29T17:37:34Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: EM12.1, rule induction note question</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Data-Science/EM12-1-rule-induction-note-question/m-p/218666#M3162</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I see, thank you for clarifying. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;My only thought is that with the large sample size for node 4, maybe the purity isn't exactly 100% as shown, but actually 99.999 or something and that precision is just not displayed here.&amp;nbsp; You could try changing the Purity Threshold property to 99 and see if it rips node 4 as expected in that case.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2015 18:00:41 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Data-Science/EM12-1-rule-induction-note-question/m-p/218666#M3162</guid>
      <dc:creator>WendyCzika</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-05-29T18:00:41Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

