<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Fine tune my SVM in EM in SAS Data Science</title>
    <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Data-Science/Fine-tune-my-SVM-in-EM/m-p/193683#M2450</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have heard many success story using SVM in predictive modeling but according to my own experience, my SVM didn't outperform my basic Logistic regression in Enterprise Miner.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Could someone help me in fine tuning my SVM?&amp;nbsp; I believe I haven't done a great job in fine tuning my SVM in EMiner and that caused the underperformance of my SVM.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Any papers or any tutorials are more than welcome!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2015 16:55:29 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>EricTsai</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2015-07-01T16:55:29Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Fine tune my SVM in EM</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Data-Science/Fine-tune-my-SVM-in-EM/m-p/193683#M2450</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have heard many success story using SVM in predictive modeling but according to my own experience, my SVM didn't outperform my basic Logistic regression in Enterprise Miner.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Could someone help me in fine tuning my SVM?&amp;nbsp; I believe I haven't done a great job in fine tuning my SVM in EMiner and that caused the underperformance of my SVM.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Any papers or any tutorials are more than welcome!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2015 16:55:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Data-Science/Fine-tune-my-SVM-in-EM/m-p/193683#M2450</guid>
      <dc:creator>EricTsai</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-07-01T16:55:29Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Fine tune my SVM in EM</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Data-Science/Fine-tune-my-SVM-in-EM/m-p/193684#M2451</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I guess you want to compare a linear SVM to your Logistic Regression. (Otherwise it's not fair &lt;img id="smileyhappy" class="emoticon emoticon-smileyhappy" src="https://communities.sas.com/i/smilies/16x16_smiley-happy.png" alt="Smiley Happy" title="Smiley Happy" /&gt; )&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Basically there is only one parameter, that you can use for tuning the linear SVM, it is the penalty value (C).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;SVMs do not outperform Logistic Regression in every situation.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;They are stable, work very well with high dimensional data...&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;SVMs are maximal margin classifiers. They work the best if there &lt;STRONG&gt;is&lt;/STRONG&gt; a margin. In business terms this means your event and non-event cases are very different. There are only a few "in the middle".&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Logistic Regression assumes a smooth transition of the probability as features change.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Don't forget to compare your models on an independent test set.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2015 14:53:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Data-Science/Fine-tune-my-SVM-in-EM/m-p/193684#M2451</guid>
      <dc:creator>gergely_batho</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-07-02T14:53:23Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

