<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Why does CLASSIFIER Statement in SCA Fail? in SAS Data Science</title>
    <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Data-Science/Why-does-CLASSIFIER-Statement-in-SCA-Fail/m-p/584074#M10038</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I've encountered a problem&amp;nbsp;in&amp;nbsp;SAS Contextual Analysis where my classifier statement fails to match on repeated concept values. I have a block of text that reads :&lt;/P&gt;&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;&lt;FONT color="#000000"&gt;Google Pixel is a brand of consumer electronic devices developed by Google that run either Chrome OS or the Android operating system. The Pixel brand was introduced in February 2013 with the first-generation Chromebook Pixel. The Pixel line includes laptops, tablets, and smartphones, as well as several accessories.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT color="#000000"&gt;In SCA I'm using a custom concept with the statement &lt;FONT color="#333399"&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;CLASSIFIER&lt;/STRONG&gt;: pixel. &lt;FONT color="#000000"&gt;When I validate the custom concept I get the following output in SCA:&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;&lt;FONT color="#000000"&gt;Google &lt;FONT color="#993366"&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Pixel &lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;is a brand of consumer electronic devices developed by Google that run either Chrome OS or the Android operating system. The &lt;FONT color="#993366"&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Pixel &lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;brand was introduced in February 2013 with the first-generation Chromebook &lt;FONT color="#993366"&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Pixel&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;. The &lt;FONT color="#993366"&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Pixel &lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;line includes laptops, tablets, and smartphones, as well as several accessories.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT color="#000000"&gt;In this case the program is correctly identifying the desired text. However, when I run the SCA Code I end up with the following output:&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;&lt;FONT color="#000000"&gt;Google &lt;FONT color="#993366"&gt;&lt;FONT color="#000000"&gt;Pixel &lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;is a brand of consumer electronic devices developed by Google that run either Chrome OS or the Android operating system. The &lt;FONT color="#993366"&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Pixel &lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;brand was introduced in February 2013 with the first-generation Chromebook Pixel. The &lt;FONT color="#993366"&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Pixel &lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;line includes laptops, tablets, and smartphones, as well as several accessories.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT color="#000000"&gt;I have already checked to make sure that Case Sensitivity is turned off. I've also run the program with multiple statements to account for variations in spelling and capitalization. SCA is still not matching on all occurrences. Does anyone know why SCA is failing to match on the other occurances of the word 'pixel'?&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 26 Aug 2019 21:14:27 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>dowdalj</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2019-08-26T21:14:27Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Why does CLASSIFIER Statement in SCA Fail?</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Data-Science/Why-does-CLASSIFIER-Statement-in-SCA-Fail/m-p/584074#M10038</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I've encountered a problem&amp;nbsp;in&amp;nbsp;SAS Contextual Analysis where my classifier statement fails to match on repeated concept values. I have a block of text that reads :&lt;/P&gt;&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;&lt;FONT color="#000000"&gt;Google Pixel is a brand of consumer electronic devices developed by Google that run either Chrome OS or the Android operating system. The Pixel brand was introduced in February 2013 with the first-generation Chromebook Pixel. The Pixel line includes laptops, tablets, and smartphones, as well as several accessories.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT color="#000000"&gt;In SCA I'm using a custom concept with the statement &lt;FONT color="#333399"&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;CLASSIFIER&lt;/STRONG&gt;: pixel. &lt;FONT color="#000000"&gt;When I validate the custom concept I get the following output in SCA:&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;&lt;FONT color="#000000"&gt;Google &lt;FONT color="#993366"&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Pixel &lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;is a brand of consumer electronic devices developed by Google that run either Chrome OS or the Android operating system. The &lt;FONT color="#993366"&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Pixel &lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;brand was introduced in February 2013 with the first-generation Chromebook &lt;FONT color="#993366"&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Pixel&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;. The &lt;FONT color="#993366"&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Pixel &lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;line includes laptops, tablets, and smartphones, as well as several accessories.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT color="#000000"&gt;In this case the program is correctly identifying the desired text. However, when I run the SCA Code I end up with the following output:&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;&lt;FONT color="#000000"&gt;Google &lt;FONT color="#993366"&gt;&lt;FONT color="#000000"&gt;Pixel &lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;is a brand of consumer electronic devices developed by Google that run either Chrome OS or the Android operating system. The &lt;FONT color="#993366"&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Pixel &lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;brand was introduced in February 2013 with the first-generation Chromebook Pixel. The &lt;FONT color="#993366"&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Pixel &lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;line includes laptops, tablets, and smartphones, as well as several accessories.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT color="#000000"&gt;I have already checked to make sure that Case Sensitivity is turned off. I've also run the program with multiple statements to account for variations in spelling and capitalization. SCA is still not matching on all occurrences. Does anyone know why SCA is failing to match on the other occurances of the word 'pixel'?&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Aug 2019 21:14:27 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Data-Science/Why-does-CLASSIFIER-Statement-in-SCA-Fail/m-p/584074#M10038</guid>
      <dc:creator>dowdalj</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-08-26T21:14:27Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Why does CLASSIFIER Statement in SCA Fail?</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Data-Science/Why-does-CLASSIFIER-Statement-in-SCA-Fail/m-p/584079#M10039</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;A guess since I don't have the software but this looks like an exclusion rule for proper names. If I have a name&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;like John Smith in a document&amp;nbsp;and am looking at text relating the profession of "Smith" I likely would not want the proper name included.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Both of your exclusions Google Pixel and Chromebook Pixel would match a proper name exclusion. So look for rules similar to that to turn off.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Aug 2019 21:24:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Data-Science/Why-does-CLASSIFIER-Statement-in-SCA-Fail/m-p/584079#M10039</guid>
      <dc:creator>ballardw</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-08-26T21:24:15Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

