<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic SAS Dataflux vs Profisee in SAS Data Management</title>
    <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Data-Management/SAS-Dataflux-vs-Profisee/m-p/928009#M20934</link>
    <description>Does anyone have compared Dataflux vs Profisee? I think that Dataflux has more features than Profisee.</description>
    <pubDate>Sun, 12 May 2024 00:12:44 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>osmelbrito</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2024-05-12T00:12:44Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>SAS Dataflux vs Profisee</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Data-Management/SAS-Dataflux-vs-Profisee/m-p/928009#M20934</link>
      <description>Does anyone have compared Dataflux vs Profisee? I think that Dataflux has more features than Profisee.</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 12 May 2024 00:12:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Data-Management/SAS-Dataflux-vs-Profisee/m-p/928009#M20934</guid>
      <dc:creator>osmelbrito</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-05-12T00:12:44Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: SAS Dataflux vs Profisee</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Data-Management/SAS-Dataflux-vs-Profisee/m-p/933244#M20956</link>
      <description>&lt;DIV&gt;I haven't spent the time to do a deep dive comparison between DataFlux and Profisee, but at a high level I would tell you that DataFlux is laser focused on data quality.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;UL&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;
&lt;DIV&gt;DataFlux can be a "light" ETL tool depending on what you are trying to do with it.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;
&lt;DIV&gt;DataFlux is able to perform parsing, standardization, enrichment, matching, and field content identification with little if any coding.&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;
&lt;DIV&gt;The Quality Knowledge Base is used to make classic data quality functions very quick and easy to invoke based on language and location.&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;
&lt;DIV&gt;DataFlux also has the ability to create business rules to look at the structure and content of the table to help users determine how "fit for use" a data element or table is.&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;
&lt;DIV&gt;The interface is built so that users with no programming experience can use DataFlux with little training.&amp;nbsp; The DataFlux solution is a thick client install.&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;/UL&gt;
&lt;DIV&gt;Profisee says it is MDM for Microsoft fabric.&amp;nbsp; The Profisee website also says that its solution can perform BI/Analytics, governance, reference data management etc.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;DIV&gt;To me it sounds like Profisee is a platform type data management solution.&amp;nbsp; The better comparison to me would be to compare SAS Viya to the Profisee solution.&amp;nbsp; SAS Viya has that robust set of data management capabilities as well as the BI/Analytics, modeling, visualization, GenAI, etc. capabilities.&lt;/DIV&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Jun 2024 03:53:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Data-Management/SAS-Dataflux-vs-Profisee/m-p/933244#M20956</guid>
      <dc:creator>MickeyS</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-06-21T03:53:39Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

