<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Need advice in updating metadata objects in SAS DI in SAS Data Management</title>
    <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Data-Management/Need-advice-in-updating-metadata-objects-in-SAS-DI/m-p/794139#M20219</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi everyone!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I was assigned to validate if the metadata changes done on the source tables are reflected on the jobs (most likely changes done are on column length and format). I traced the metadata objects impacted by these source tables and noticed that some of the columns and mappings are not yet updated. I also saw that the transformation codes are using the old length and format. With this scenario, may I know which of the following is the correct way of aligning the metadata objects on the table source?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Table &amp;gt; Properties &amp;gt; Update Columns?&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Transformation &amp;gt; Properties &amp;gt; Update&amp;nbsp; Mappings?&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Transformation &amp;gt; Properties &amp;gt; Update Code?&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you so much!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 02 Feb 2022 23:24:13 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>meatballs12345</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2022-02-02T23:24:13Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Need advice in updating metadata objects in SAS DI</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Data-Management/Need-advice-in-updating-metadata-objects-in-SAS-DI/m-p/794139#M20219</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi everyone!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I was assigned to validate if the metadata changes done on the source tables are reflected on the jobs (most likely changes done are on column length and format). I traced the metadata objects impacted by these source tables and noticed that some of the columns and mappings are not yet updated. I also saw that the transformation codes are using the old length and format. With this scenario, may I know which of the following is the correct way of aligning the metadata objects on the table source?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Table &amp;gt; Properties &amp;gt; Update Columns?&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Transformation &amp;gt; Properties &amp;gt; Update&amp;nbsp; Mappings?&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Transformation &amp;gt; Properties &amp;gt; Update Code?&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you so much!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Feb 2022 23:24:13 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Data-Management/Need-advice-in-updating-metadata-objects-in-SAS-DI/m-p/794139#M20219</guid>
      <dc:creator>meatballs12345</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-02-02T23:24:13Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

