<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: SAS DI Studio Custom Transformation Help in SAS Data Management</title>
    <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Data-Management/SAS-DI-Studio-Custom-Transformation-Help/m-p/420426#M12894</link>
    <description>Well macro is the direction. But without writing the actual code for you...bu it will involve analysing how many input tables you have, and perform various %do loops for joining criteria.&lt;BR /&gt;But, building a macro for joining various no of input table is signalling to me at least that there perhaps is not much reusability here. Why not use the standard Join transformation?</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 12 Dec 2017 11:31:01 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>LinusH</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2017-12-12T11:31:01Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>SAS DI Studio Custom Transformation Help</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Data-Management/SAS-DI-Studio-Custom-Transformation-Help/m-p/420418#M12893</link>
      <description />
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Dec 2017 09:57:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Data-Management/SAS-DI-Studio-Custom-Transformation-Help/m-p/420418#M12893</guid>
      <dc:creator>illusoryduck</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-12-19T09:57:40Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: SAS DI Studio Custom Transformation Help</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Data-Management/SAS-DI-Studio-Custom-Transformation-Help/m-p/420426#M12894</link>
      <description>Well macro is the direction. But without writing the actual code for you...bu it will involve analysing how many input tables you have, and perform various %do loops for joining criteria.&lt;BR /&gt;But, building a macro for joining various no of input table is signalling to me at least that there perhaps is not much reusability here. Why not use the standard Join transformation?</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Dec 2017 11:31:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Data-Management/SAS-DI-Studio-Custom-Transformation-Help/m-p/420426#M12894</guid>
      <dc:creator>LinusH</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-12-12T11:31:01Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: SAS DI Studio Custom Transformation Help</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Data-Management/SAS-DI-Studio-Custom-Transformation-Help/m-p/420724#M12909</link>
      <description>I can't grasp the whole scenario in detail but is sounds like that each step could be preformed by other standard transformations.&lt;BR /&gt;Again, the join part is not a good fit for a user written transformation.</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2017 10:03:12 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Data-Management/SAS-DI-Studio-Custom-Transformation-Help/m-p/420724#M12909</guid>
      <dc:creator>LinusH</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-12-13T10:03:12Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

