<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic &amp;quot;Thresholding&amp;quot; technique for collapsing levels in SAS Academy for Data Science</title>
    <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Academy-for-Data-Science/quot-Thresholding-quot-technique-for-collapsing-levels/m-p/650184#M812</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Re: Predictive Modeling Using Logistic Regression&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Thresholding for collapsing levels (p.3-17)&lt;BR /&gt;When applying thresholding (page 3.17 of course text), instead of grouping all small levels into a single "OTHER", as an alternative approach, would it not make sense to try to aggregate them with the other existing levels, either based on domain knowledge/similarity in meaning (e.g. for residential status, all levels related to "renting" could be grouped together) and/or proportion of response?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Sun, 24 May 2020 14:47:41 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>pvareschi</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2020-05-24T14:47:41Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>"Thresholding" technique for collapsing levels</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Academy-for-Data-Science/quot-Thresholding-quot-technique-for-collapsing-levels/m-p/650184#M812</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Re: Predictive Modeling Using Logistic Regression&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Thresholding for collapsing levels (p.3-17)&lt;BR /&gt;When applying thresholding (page 3.17 of course text), instead of grouping all small levels into a single "OTHER", as an alternative approach, would it not make sense to try to aggregate them with the other existing levels, either based on domain knowledge/similarity in meaning (e.g. for residential status, all levels related to "renting" could be grouped together) and/or proportion of response?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 24 May 2020 14:47:41 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Academy-for-Data-Science/quot-Thresholding-quot-technique-for-collapsing-levels/m-p/650184#M812</guid>
      <dc:creator>pvareschi</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-05-24T14:47:41Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: "Thresholding" technique for collapsing levels</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Academy-for-Data-Science/quot-Thresholding-quot-technique-for-collapsing-levels/m-p/650515#M819</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Re: Predictive Modeling Using Logistic Regression&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Thresholding for collapsing levels (p.3-17)&lt;BR /&gt;When applying thresholding (page 3.17 of course text), instead of grouping all small levels into a single "OTHER", as an alternative approach, would it not make sense to try to aggregate them with the other existing levels, either based on domain knowledge/similarity in meaning (e.g. for residential status, all levels related to "renting" could be grouped together) and/or proportion of response?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT color="#0000FF"&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;My response:&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT color="#0000FF"&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;I agree with your comments that rather than dumping rare levels into other group we could use&amp;nbsp; your business knowledge or tools available in SAS EM (Decision tree node, Variable selection mode) and assign rare levels to other correlated levels.&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2020 19:51:54 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Academy-for-Data-Science/quot-Thresholding-quot-technique-for-collapsing-levels/m-p/650515#M819</guid>
      <dc:creator>gcjfernandez</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-05-25T19:51:54Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

