<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Categorical inputs and standardisation in Neural Networks in SAS Academy for Data Science</title>
    <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Academy-for-Data-Science/Categorical-inputs-and-standardisation-in-Neural-Networks/m-p/646963#M765</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT style="background-color: #ffffff;"&gt;Re:&amp;nbsp;Applied Analytics Using SAS Enterprise Miner&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT style="background-color: #ffffff;"&gt;&lt;FONT style="background-color: #ffffff; box-sizing: border-box; color: #333333; font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif; font-size: 16px; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: 300; letter-spacing: normal; orphans: 2; text-align: left; text-decoration: none; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; white-space: normal; word-spacing: 0px;"&gt;1. Are categorical inputs represented as dummy indicator variables in a Neural Network (Chapter 5 of course notes)? If so, are those indicators standardised based on the setting of property "Network -&amp;gt; Input Standardisation" (see page 5-8 of course notes)?&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;2&lt;FONT style="background-color: #ffffff;"&gt;. In what scenarios would it make sense to use the other options in property "Input Standardization" (i.e. Range and MidRange)? (see page 5-8 of course notes)&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT style="background-color: #ffffff;"&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="input_standardisation.png" style="width: 604px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://communities.sas.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/39322i6488379F8C66E170/image-size/large?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" role="button" title="input_standardisation.png" alt="input_standardisation.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2020 05:14:40 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>pvareschi</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2020-05-12T05:14:40Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Categorical inputs and standardisation in Neural Networks</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Academy-for-Data-Science/Categorical-inputs-and-standardisation-in-Neural-Networks/m-p/646963#M765</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT style="background-color: #ffffff;"&gt;Re:&amp;nbsp;Applied Analytics Using SAS Enterprise Miner&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT style="background-color: #ffffff;"&gt;&lt;FONT style="background-color: #ffffff; box-sizing: border-box; color: #333333; font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif; font-size: 16px; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: 300; letter-spacing: normal; orphans: 2; text-align: left; text-decoration: none; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; white-space: normal; word-spacing: 0px;"&gt;1. Are categorical inputs represented as dummy indicator variables in a Neural Network (Chapter 5 of course notes)? If so, are those indicators standardised based on the setting of property "Network -&amp;gt; Input Standardisation" (see page 5-8 of course notes)?&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;2&lt;FONT style="background-color: #ffffff;"&gt;. In what scenarios would it make sense to use the other options in property "Input Standardization" (i.e. Range and MidRange)? (see page 5-8 of course notes)&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT style="background-color: #ffffff;"&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="input_standardisation.png" style="width: 604px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://communities.sas.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/39322i6488379F8C66E170/image-size/large?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" role="button" title="input_standardisation.png" alt="input_standardisation.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2020 05:14:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Academy-for-Data-Science/Categorical-inputs-and-standardisation-in-Neural-Networks/m-p/646963#M765</guid>
      <dc:creator>pvareschi</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-05-12T05:14:40Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Categorical inputs and standardisation in Neural Networks</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Academy-for-Data-Science/Categorical-inputs-and-standardisation-in-Neural-Networks/m-p/653986#M873</link>
      <description>Unfortunately the answer is not simple. It depends on the complexity of the data, type of neural network structure and the type of activation function etc, My recommendation is do a simple experiment with the your data with different  standardization methods and determine which method is appropriate. Build a standard process flow diagram with this comparison (comparing different standardization)  in SAS EM and routinely  run this as a preliminary step before developing your NN.</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 07 Jun 2020 03:02:05 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Academy-for-Data-Science/Categorical-inputs-and-standardisation-in-Neural-Networks/m-p/653986#M873</guid>
      <dc:creator>gcjfernandez</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-06-07T03:02:05Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

