<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Treatment of boundary for values for cut-off in SAS Academy for Data Science</title>
    <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Academy-for-Data-Science/Treatment-of-boundary-for-values-for-cut-off/m-p/644797#M714</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;When applying a cut-off to classify a case (by default set at 0.5), how does Enterprise Miner treat a case with a posterior probability equal to exactly 0.5? For example, "&lt;FONT&gt;Lesson 4: Decision Trees Using SAS Enterprise Miner" -&amp;gt; "Working with Decision Trees" (under "&lt;FONT&gt;Applied Analytics Using SAS Enterprise Miner&lt;/FONT&gt;") does not cover this eventuality. However, "Lesson 7: Model Assessment Using SAS Enterprise Miner", "Calculating Expected Profit" seems to hint to the fact that scenario would be classified as a primary event (i.e. 1).&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT&gt;Does the same logic applies when creating the data for a ROC chart? (&lt;FONT&gt;"Lesson 7: Model Assessment Using SAS Enterprise Miner", "ROC charts")&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Sun, 03 May 2020 06:25:10 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>pvareschi</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2020-05-03T06:25:10Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Treatment of boundary for values for cut-off</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Academy-for-Data-Science/Treatment-of-boundary-for-values-for-cut-off/m-p/644797#M714</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;When applying a cut-off to classify a case (by default set at 0.5), how does Enterprise Miner treat a case with a posterior probability equal to exactly 0.5? For example, "&lt;FONT&gt;Lesson 4: Decision Trees Using SAS Enterprise Miner" -&amp;gt; "Working with Decision Trees" (under "&lt;FONT&gt;Applied Analytics Using SAS Enterprise Miner&lt;/FONT&gt;") does not cover this eventuality. However, "Lesson 7: Model Assessment Using SAS Enterprise Miner", "Calculating Expected Profit" seems to hint to the fact that scenario would be classified as a primary event (i.e. 1).&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT&gt;Does the same logic applies when creating the data for a ROC chart? (&lt;FONT&gt;"Lesson 7: Model Assessment Using SAS Enterprise Miner", "ROC charts")&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 03 May 2020 06:25:10 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Academy-for-Data-Science/Treatment-of-boundary-for-values-for-cut-off/m-p/644797#M714</guid>
      <dc:creator>pvareschi</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-05-03T06:25:10Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Treatment of boundary for values for cut-off</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Academy-for-Data-Science/Treatment-of-boundary-for-values-for-cut-off/m-p/644986#M719</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp; Feedback from the instructors:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;"SAS EM nodes by default classifies the case as an event when the posterior probability &amp;gt; or eq to 0.5. If the posterior probability is &amp;lt; 0.5 then the case is classified as non-event."&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Hope this helps,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Cynthia&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2020 13:24:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Academy-for-Data-Science/Treatment-of-boundary-for-values-for-cut-off/m-p/644986#M719</guid>
      <dc:creator>Cynthia_sas</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-05-04T13:24:46Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

