<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: use model to explain in All Things Community</title>
    <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/All-Things-Community/use-model-to-explain/m-p/842899#M4730</link>
    <description>&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;HR /&gt;&lt;a href="https://communities.sas.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/436612"&gt;@victory&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;wrote:&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;P&gt;The question is which is the best model to explain these two highest/lowest alpha portfolio returns&lt;BR /&gt;from 2011 to 2015? (Note: you should judge the model performance by goodness-of-fit&lt;BR /&gt;and parameter significance, not by alpha alone. Since some of these models are nested,&lt;BR /&gt;try to use F-tests to compare them while you can.).&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;The question is about examine whether portfolio alpha is still significant &lt;U&gt;with more factors&lt;/U&gt;. I have no idea about, someone told me the output is like that. Using four model to deal with it&amp;nbsp;probably.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;HR /&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I don't see any "goodness-of-fit" statistics. Depending on the procedure you are running to create the "model" different fit statistics are often available. Where are the suggested F-tests?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I'm not even sure that I understand what your "alpha" may be. In many modeling discussions alpha is a set level of interest for a significance test, such as alpha=0.05. So typically alpha is not dependent on or the result of a model .&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 07 Nov 2022 16:19:30 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>ballardw</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2022-11-07T16:19:30Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>use model to explain</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/All-Things-Community/use-model-to-explain/m-p/842764#M4724</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;i am a novice at sas. Examine whether the portfolio alpha is still significant with more factors. The question: Which is the best model to explain these two highest/lowest alpha portfolio returns.&amp;nbsp; I&amp;nbsp;have the data.&amp;nbsp; use four models, and&amp;nbsp;which four models? How can i get the output like photo。&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="S__80084999.jpg" style="width: 778px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://communities.sas.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/77009iB77C3C928849D2AB/image-size/large?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" role="button" title="S__80084999.jpg" alt="S__80084999.jpg" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;thanks all.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Nov 2022 03:44:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/All-Things-Community/use-model-to-explain/m-p/842764#M4724</guid>
      <dc:creator>victory</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-11-07T03:44:39Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: use model to explain</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/All-Things-Community/use-model-to-explain/m-p/842782#M4725</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I don't understand anything about your screen capture from Excel. Can you please explain what we are seeing so that we can understand it?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Next, what does this have to do with SAS?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 06 Nov 2022 20:41:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/All-Things-Community/use-model-to-explain/m-p/842782#M4725</guid>
      <dc:creator>PaigeMiller</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-11-06T20:41:42Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: use model to explain</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/All-Things-Community/use-model-to-explain/m-p/842813#M4726</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;The question is which is the best model to explain these two highest/lowest alpha portfolio returns&lt;BR /&gt;from 2011 to 2015? (Note: you should judge the model performance by goodness-of-fit&lt;BR /&gt;and parameter significance, not by alpha alone. Since some of these models are nested,&lt;BR /&gt;try to use F-tests to compare them while you can.).&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The question is about examine whether portfolio alpha is still significant &lt;U&gt;with more factors&lt;/U&gt;. I have no idea about, someone told me the output is like that. Using four model to deal with it&amp;nbsp;probably.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Nov 2022 03:51:19 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/All-Things-Community/use-model-to-explain/m-p/842813#M4726</guid>
      <dc:creator>victory</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-11-07T03:51:19Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: use model to explain</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/All-Things-Community/use-model-to-explain/m-p/842839#M4729</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;What are the numbers? What is the red cell?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Nov 2022 10:41:12 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/All-Things-Community/use-model-to-explain/m-p/842839#M4729</guid>
      <dc:creator>PaigeMiller</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-11-07T10:41:12Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: use model to explain</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/All-Things-Community/use-model-to-explain/m-p/842899#M4730</link>
      <description>&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;HR /&gt;&lt;a href="https://communities.sas.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/436612"&gt;@victory&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;wrote:&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;P&gt;The question is which is the best model to explain these two highest/lowest alpha portfolio returns&lt;BR /&gt;from 2011 to 2015? (Note: you should judge the model performance by goodness-of-fit&lt;BR /&gt;and parameter significance, not by alpha alone. Since some of these models are nested,&lt;BR /&gt;try to use F-tests to compare them while you can.).&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;The question is about examine whether portfolio alpha is still significant &lt;U&gt;with more factors&lt;/U&gt;. I have no idea about, someone told me the output is like that. Using four model to deal with it&amp;nbsp;probably.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;HR /&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I don't see any "goodness-of-fit" statistics. Depending on the procedure you are running to create the "model" different fit statistics are often available. Where are the suggested F-tests?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I'm not even sure that I understand what your "alpha" may be. In many modeling discussions alpha is a set level of interest for a significance test, such as alpha=0.05. So typically alpha is not dependent on or the result of a model .&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Nov 2022 16:19:30 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/All-Things-Community/use-model-to-explain/m-p/842899#M4730</guid>
      <dc:creator>ballardw</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-11-07T16:19:30Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

