<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Data Transformation_normality in All Things Community</title>
    <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/All-Things-Community/Data-Transformation-normality/m-p/339868#M2244</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi All,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The attached file contains moisture content in percent measured using two methods. Data of both the methods is not normal. I need to develop a Bland and Altman graph on the difference (diffs) of both the methods that require&amp;nbsp;the diffs to be normally distributed. I tried various&amp;nbsp;log, log10, sqrt, and square&amp;nbsp;to transform the original&amp;nbsp;data but they don't&amp;nbsp;improve the normality. The Shapiro-Wilks&amp;nbsp;test rejects the normality, but visually data seems to be fine except for the diffs.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Kindly suggest me how to improve normality of the data with the SAS&amp;nbsp;codes if possible. Thank you very much&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 10 Mar 2017 03:30:34 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>fridge_wpg</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2017-03-10T03:30:34Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Data Transformation_normality</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/All-Things-Community/Data-Transformation-normality/m-p/339868#M2244</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi All,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The attached file contains moisture content in percent measured using two methods. Data of both the methods is not normal. I need to develop a Bland and Altman graph on the difference (diffs) of both the methods that require&amp;nbsp;the diffs to be normally distributed. I tried various&amp;nbsp;log, log10, sqrt, and square&amp;nbsp;to transform the original&amp;nbsp;data but they don't&amp;nbsp;improve the normality. The Shapiro-Wilks&amp;nbsp;test rejects the normality, but visually data seems to be fine except for the diffs.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Kindly suggest me how to improve normality of the data with the SAS&amp;nbsp;codes if possible. Thank you very much&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Mar 2017 03:30:34 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/All-Things-Community/Data-Transformation-normality/m-p/339868#M2244</guid>
      <dc:creator>fridge_wpg</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-03-10T03:30:34Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Data Transformation_normality</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/All-Things-Community/Data-Transformation-normality/m-p/339886#M2245</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Normality is not the problem here. There is a non trivial relationship between the two measurement methods that you should not ignore.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;IMG src="https://communities.sas.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/7659iC4EF53356C78E86C/image-size/medium?v=1.0&amp;amp;px=-1" border="0" alt="SGPlot5.png" title="SGPlot5.png" /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;What is the goal of your analysis?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Note: The graph was made with:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;PRE&gt;&lt;CODE class=" language-sas"&gt;proc sort data=trans; by method_a;

proc sgplot data=trans noautolegend;
scatter x=method_a y=method_b;
series x=method_a y=method_a;
loess x=method_a y=method_b / smooth=0.7;
run;
&lt;/CODE&gt;&lt;/PRE&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Mar 2017 17:33:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/All-Things-Community/Data-Transformation-normality/m-p/339886#M2245</guid>
      <dc:creator>PGStats</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-03-23T17:33:29Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Data Transformation_normality</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/All-Things-Community/Data-Transformation-normality/m-p/339925#M2246</link>
      <description>&lt;PRE&gt;
Check PROC MCMC   

&lt;/PRE&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Mar 2017 08:28:35 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/All-Things-Community/Data-Transformation-normality/m-p/339925#M2246</guid>
      <dc:creator>Ksharp</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-03-10T08:28:35Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Data Transformation_normality</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/All-Things-Community/Data-Transformation-normality/m-p/343114#M2299</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi PG,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you very much for your input on this. Sorry for a delayed response, I opened&amp;nbsp;this message previously on my cell phone where the graph was not visible. But, now on my computer, I could see, and it caught my attention.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Let me pick your brain; what is that non-trivial relationship between the two measurement methods, please?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;(Measurement with Method_A is based on calibration and Method_B is a gold standard method measurement. Moreover (This is what I see): method_A underestimate at higher concentration while over-estimate at low concentration!!!?).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Before, I answer your question about my goal for the analysis. A little background on the dataset:. &amp;nbsp;Apart from the dataset that you see, I have another independent data on two paired measurements (TEMR and TEM%) on a &amp;nbsp;population (N-238) to develop a regression&amp;nbsp;model. There is a published regression model (TEM%=1.11*TEMR), and &amp;nbsp;I have used the published regression coefficient (y=1.11) on my TEMR &amp;nbsp;readings to get &amp;nbsp;"Method_A" and have compared as shown in the graph with my TEM% readings "Method_B."&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;My goal of the analysis is to demonstrate graphically that measurement by the methods differ (I have developed Bland and Altman graphs) and I don't know yet how to compare the methods statistically, probably will do a paired t-test&amp;nbsp;(any thought on this, please?)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am also thinking of comparing the slope of the published regression model with the regression model that I am developing. Please, advise how I can do a "Chow test" (requesting SAS code) on the two regression models to see if the slopes differ? (I don't&amp;nbsp;have access to the published data; just the regression coefficient).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Lastly, how have you developed the trend line (SAS code of the gplot,&amp;nbsp;please) on the data point in the graph?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you very much again&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Fridge_wpg&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Mar 2017 23:26:54 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/All-Things-Community/Data-Transformation-normality/m-p/343114#M2299</guid>
      <dc:creator>fridge_wpg</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-03-21T23:26:54Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

