topic How many replies, messages or new topics do we have to start "Have Your Say"? in All Things Community

How many replies, messages or new topics do we have to start "Have Your Say"?

AG_Stats — Tue, 17 May 2016 18:48:28 GMT

Hi Everyone,

Please someone let me know that how many replies, messages or new topics do we have to start "Have Your Say"?

Re: How many replies, messages or new topics do we have to start "Have Your Say"?

PGStats — Tue, 17 May 2016 19:51:07 GMT

You made me look .

Seemingly, the Have Your Say community is very select. Here is what I got

Welcome PGStats!
Got something to say that's a little bit different? This is the place.

Thank you for being a communities member for so long! By our count, you 
have shared 3525 messages. For now, you can just read and reply to the 
messages in this off-topic lounge. When you get a little bit more experience in 
the communities, you'll earn the ability to start your own topics!

I can't wait!

Re: How many replies, messages or new topics do we have to start "Have Your Say"?

ChrisHemedinger — Tue, 17 May 2016 20:41:08 GMT

You have to be a "Frequent Contributor" or higher -- @AG_Stats, you're almost there! It's not all about activity -- there is a tenure requirement as well. We don't want to encourage those "fly by night" posters 🙂

Seriously, you're almost there. Keep coming back; you should achieve it by week's end.

And @PGStats - I guess you've earned it. Hopefully got you fixed up.

Re: How many replies, messages or new topics do we have to start "Have Your Say"?

AG_Stats — Wed, 18 May 2016 04:34:50 GMT

What about PGStats I don't get. Does he saying truth or just making fun.. or has he temporarily blocked or what new thing has happened.

Re: How many replies, messages or new topics do we have to start "Have Your Say"?

ChrisHemedinger — Wed, 18 May 2016 12:02:18 GMT

Well @AG_Stats, @PGStats is one of our Super Users, so he has definitely earned the privilege for starting topics in Have Your Say. We had a gap in our rank/privilege system though that didn't include Super Users for this -- I've fixed it.